HALLIBURTON & BAKER HUGHES PROBLEMS: $35 BLN
More than a year after it was announced, Halliburton Co.'s $35 billion deal to buy Baker Hughes Inc. is facing a growing list of antitrust concerns from the U.S. Justice Department and other competition authorities world-wide that could threaten the combination.
Meanwhile, plunging oil prices have reduced demand for drilling, complicating the oilfield-service giants' efforts to find buyers for assets they would need to sell for the deal to pass regulatory muster, executives and experts say.
The Justice Department, which is concerned the tie-up would suppress competition, is questioning whether other companies could buy some of these assets and become credible rivals to the combined company, according to people familiar with the matter.
Halliburton recently met with the department's top antitrust official, Bill Baer, to talk about the deal, some people familiar with the deliberations said, a sign the review process has reached a critical stage.
A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment.
Halliburton and Baker Hughes, which do the physical work of drilling wells and extracting oil and natural gas for energy companies, trail only Schlumberger Ltd. in the marketplace.
"Everything about this deal has turned out to be more complicated and, frankly, more challenging than what was initially envisioned," said William Herbert, co-head of securities atSimmons & Co. International, an energy-focused investment bank in Houston.
Across the Atlantic, Halliburton recently resubmitted its merger filing to the European Commission, which had decided that important information for assessing the transaction was missing from a filing this summer. The commission has set a Jan. 12 deadline for clearing the merger or starting an in-depth investigation.
The merger is also receiving continued antitrust scrutiny in other countries including Australia, Brazil and China.
Antitrust authorities in Brazil and Australia have voiced concerns about the sheer size of the deal for customers seeking a package of integrated services from large firms like Halliburton and Baker Hughes. Halliburton said it is working with regulators around the world.
Christian Garcia, Halliburton's interim chief financial officer, said Wednesday the company was confident the deal would close, but conceded that the goal of wrapping it up in 2015 was all but dead. He said the company is having "substantive discussions" with the Justice Department as a Dec. 15 deadline looms.
The department isn't necessarily obligated to make a decision by that date, because antitrust issues in other international jurisdictions won't be resolved by then. The two sides have the option to reach a new timing agreement.
Halliburton has argued that the merger will provide better value for its customers, and that competition in the oil patch is already intense, with low oil prices pushing every company to slash prices.
Analysts expect Halliburton will go to great lengths to see the deal through, even if it means selling off a lot of its product lines at discounted prices.
Halliburton will have to pay $3.5 billion to Baker Hughes if antitrust enforcers block their combination, but Baker Hughes also has reason to remain committed to the deal's success. It would likely emerge from a failed sales process even weaker than it was before.
Baker Hughes declined to comment.
The price of crude oil had already started to slide from its June 2014 peak when the companies agreed to the tie-up in November that year. Since then, oil-company clients have slashed their spending plans, forcing oil-field service companies to do the same. Halliburton and Baker Hughes have laid off nearly 35,000 employees between them, or more than 20% of their respective workforces.
So far the companies have announced plans to sell overlapping product lines that generated $5.2 billion in revenue, and are considering whether they will need to cast off more, according to people familiar with the matter. They agreed last year to sell as much as $7.5 billion worth of business if required by regulators.
Richard Spears, vice president of Spears & Associates, a research firm, said he has talked to several companies interested in bidding for the castoffs. Even so, he believes the severity of oil's downturn may have spooked other would-be buyers.
"It's hard to be excited to be an investor in the oil field in 2015," he said. "The downturn isn't done yet."
Asset sales could be more difficult if, as the Australians and Brazilians signaled, regulators want to preserve competition among large, global firms that can provide a wide range of services in the oil patch, rather than focusing on overlap in narrow lines of business.
"In that case, you're probably talking about a much smaller pool of potential bidders that would both be interested and able to buy everything and considered eligible by regulatory authorities," said Thomas Curran, an analyst at FBR & Co.
Mr. Garcia, Halliburton's finance chief, said Wednesday that the company is finalizing negotiations with buyers for its first set of asset sales, and is holding targeted discussions with potential buyers for a second set. He said the Justice Department hasn't stated it would have to sell to a single buyer.
General Electric Co., which has expanded its oil-and-gas segment in recent years, has signaled an interest in expanding and is an active participant in the divestiture process, but no deal is imminent, according to people familiar with the matter.
|May, 25, 10:55:00|
|May, 25, 10:50:00|
|May, 25, 10:45:00|
|May, 25, 10:40:00|
|May, 25, 10:35:00|
|May, 25, 10:30:00|
REUTERS - Brent LCOc1 futures fell 43 cents, or 0.5 percent, to $79.14 a barrel by 0218 GMT, after climbing 35 cents on Tuesday. Last week, the global benchmark hit $80.50 a barrel, the highest since November 2014. U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude CLc1 futures eased 25 cents, or 0.4 percent, to $71.95 a barrel, having climbed on Tuesday to $72.83 a barrel, the highest since November 2014.
FT - Most oil majors can now cover dividends and capital expenditure at prices around $50 per barrel, meaning that, at $80, they make a healthy surplus.
EIA - The United States remained the world's top producer of petroleum and natural gas hydrocarbons in 2017, reaching a record high. The United States has been the world's top producer of natural gas since 2009, when U.S. natural gas production surpassed that of Russia, and the world's top producer of petroleum hydrocarbons since 2013, when U.S. production exceeded Saudi Arabia’s. Since 2008, U.S. petroleum and natural gas production has increased by nearly 60%.
PLATTS - China became the largest contributor to global LNG consumption growth in 2017. It surpassed South Korea as the world's second largest LNG importer and its share of global LNG demand is expected to converge with that of Japan by 2030.