Здравствуйте. Вся информация этого сайта бесплатна. Вы можете сделать пожертвование и поддержать наше развитие. Спасибо.

Hello. All information of this site is free of charge. You can make a donation and support our development. Thank you.

2016-06-22 18:05:00

TANZANIA & UGANDA PIPELINE: $4 BLN

TANZANIA & UGANDA PIPELINE: $4 BLN

 

TANZANIA UGANDA OIL PIPELINE MAP

 

According to WSJ, the Ugandan and Tanzanian governments are trying to fast-track a $4 billion oil pipeline that would connect landlocked Uganda to foreign markets even though construction won't start in August as they originally indicated.

The companies behind what could be East Africa's first major oil pipeline believe the August start-date that Tanzanian officials gave last March for work on the 900-mile pipeline through Tanzania is unrealistic.

But the governments have made more progress in preparing the way for construction to start on the project that would transport Ugandan crude to the Tanzanian port of Tanga on the Indian Ocean, industry officials said.

Tanzanian and Ugandan government officials weren't immediately reachable for comment.

French oil giant Total SA, the UK-based Tullow Oil and Chinese state-owned oil company Cnooc Ltd. are the three firms developing Uganda's oil fields and all three companies are expected to invest in the Ugandan pipeline which will have an estimated capacity of 200,000 barrels a day.

For now, there is no definitive start date for construction in the absence of an official development plan, Total and Tullow officials said. Cnooc couldn't be reached for comment.

With no official development plan in place, it is certain that the construction phase is still several months away.

The overall aim is to keep Uganda on track with the goal of exporting its first crude reserves by 2020. Analysts and developers now say a 36-month timeline is the best- case scenario with work starting as soon as possible. If this was to go ahead as planned construction would be completed in mid-2019 allowing several months for testing and commissioning before the infrastructure became fully operational.

"Bear in mind in this industry, the project development is always long," Damien Steffan, a Total spokesperson, said in an email. "On average, it takes 10 to 15 years between the moment when you make a discovery and the moment of first-oil."

Uganda now ranks as the fourth-largest reserve for crude oil in sub-Saharan Africa with the discovery of 6.5 billion barrels of oil since 2006, of which 1.2 and 1.7 billion are recoverable, according to the International Monetary Fund.

Uganda's break-even price per barrel is estimated to be $60, according to Paul Bagabo, a Uganda-based consultant for the nonprofit organization Natural Resource Governance Institute. That is below current global crude prices, around $50 a barrel.

Mr. Bagabo said the relatively high cost of production in Uganda raises concerns that investors may be tempted to back out of infrastructure development if global prices fail to recover further.

To protect itself from any external oil price shocks, create jobs and provide domestic consumers with products such as gasoline and diesel, Uganda also plans to build a 60,000 b/barrels a day oil refinery in tandem with the pipeline.

"With the refinery we can opt to export while [the pipeline] completes," Mr. Bagabo said. "The refinery is critical for Uganda's specific interest and the interests of economic development."

The Ugandan government is in the final stages of acquiring land for the refinery which will be constructed and operated by the Russian state-owned firm, RT Global Resources, in the country's west near the town of Kabale, he said.

The Ugandan government officially announced its pipeline partnership with Tanzania in late April. This backtracked on a previous understanding with the Kenyan government that Uganda would jointly develop a pipeline that would run through Kenya.

The Tanzanian route, which a commissioned study said was cheaper and safer from attacks from militant groups like al-Shabaab, was also billed as a way to hasten the project.

Total and Tullow were initially at odds over the selected route. Tullow, which also has interests in Kenya's oil fields, supported a Kenyan pathway for the pipeline. In contrast, Total, the biggest stakeholder in Uganda's oil fields, is said to have lobbied hard for an alternative.

-----

Earlier: 

OIL PRICES: UP TO AFRICA 

TOTAL & UGANDA FIGHTING 

NEW AFRICA PRIORITIES 

UGANDA: 85% UP 

TANZANIA OFFSHORE GAS: 216 MB 

AFRICA NEED CONSULTANT 

TANZANIA STEPS UP 

AFRICA: OIL DEMAND UP

 

 

Tags: AFRICA, OIL, PIPELINE, TANZANIA, UGANDA

Chronicle:

TANZANIA & UGANDA PIPELINE: $4 BLN
2018, July, 16, 10:35:00

CHINA'S INVESTMENT FOR NIGERIA: $14+3 BLN

AN - China National Offshore Oil Corp. (CNOOC) is willing to invest $3 billion in its existing oil and gas operation in Nigeria, the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) said on Sunday following a meeting with the Chinese in Abuja.

TANZANIA & UGANDA PIPELINE: $4 BLN
2018, July, 16, 10:30:00

LIBYA'S OIL DOWN 160 TBD

REUTERS - Production at Libya’s giant Sharara oil field was expected to fall by at least 160,000 barrels per day (bpd) on Saturday after two staff were abducted in an attack by an unknown group, the National Oil Corporation (NOC) said.

TANZANIA & UGANDA PIPELINE: $4 BLN
2018, July, 16, 10:25:00

BAHRAIN'S GDP UP 3.2%

IMF - Output grew by 3.8 percent in 2017, underpinned by a resilient non-hydrocarbon sector, with robust implementation of GCC-funded projects as well as strong activity in the financial, hospitality, and education sectors. The banking system remains stable with large capital buffers. Growth is projected to decelerate over the medium term.

TANZANIA & UGANDA PIPELINE: $4 BLN
2018, July, 16, 10:20:00

NIGERIA'S GDP UP 2%

IMF - Higher oil prices and short-term portfolio inflows have provided relief from external and fiscal pressures but the recovery remains challenging. Inflation declined to its lowest level in more than two years. Real GDP expanded by 2 percent in the first quarter of 2018 compared to the first quarter of last year. However, activity in the non-oil non-agricultural sector remains weak as lower purchasing power weighs on consumer demand and as credit risk continues to limit bank lending.

All Publications »