RUSSIA SANCTIONS ANEW
FT - Proposed new US sanctions on Russia approved by the Senate could have "unintended consequences", hitting US jobs and oil and gas projects around the world, the industry has warned.
The legislation, which passed with a 97-2 vote in the Senate last month and is now with the House of Representatives, would prohibit US individuals and companies from providing goods, services or technology for deepwater, Arctic offshore or shale projects where Russian companies are "involved".
But oil executives and industry representatives have warned that the proposed rules are so broadly drawn that they could hurt the competitiveness of US companies and potentially hamper oil and gas production in many countries other than Russia.
Leslie Beyer, president of the US Petroleum Equipment & Services Association, wrote to Kevin McCarthy, the Republican majority leader in the House, on Monday warning that the proposed "dramatic escalation" of sanctions could hamper US companies in world markets, causing "job losses and economic contraction in . . . American communities".
Jack Gerard, president of industry group the American Petroleum Institute, said on Monday that he supported the use of sanctions but did not believe Republicans and Democrats in the Senate intended to hurt US oil companies. He urged the House to "make critical modifications to avoid these unintended consequences".
US companies hope the House will revise the curbs to narrow their scope. Some Republican members have indicated they are in favour of such a move but leading Democrats have supported the legislation exactly as it was approved by the Senate.
European energy groups have also strongly criticised the bill over measures that would bar US companies from investing in or working on oil and gas export pipelines from Russia, including the Nord Stream 2 project to deliver gas to Germany.
The planned sanctions extend the measures taken against Russia following its annexation of Crimea in 2014. They were approved to punish Russia for its alleged interference in the 2016 US election, and were added to a Senate bill tightening restrictions on Iran.
The subsequent revelations about a meeting last year between Donald Trump Jr, the eldest son of US President Donald Trump, and a Russian lawyer — to obtain information on Hillary Clinton purportedly being offered by a senior Russian official — have raised the temperature over US relations with Russia.
As drafted, the rules approved by the Senate could bar US companies and individuals from working either as partners or suppliers on any shale, deepwater or Arctic oil project anywhere in the world where a Russian company has a stake, however small.
The legislation could also stop US companies developing projects where a Russian company is not a partner but has a stake in critical infrastructure — for example in Vietnam, where Russia's state-controlled oil group Rosneft has a 32.67 per cent stake in the Nam Con Son pipeline system that brings oil and gas onshore.
Projects that could be affected include BP's $28bn Shah Deniz 2 gas development in Azerbaijan, where Lukoil, a Russian oil company subject to existing sanctions, has a 10 per cent stake. There are no US partners in the project consortium but it relies heavily on equipment and services from US companies.
The development is intended to supply gas to Europe to compete with Russian production, highlighting the potentially perverse effects of the new sanctions.
The Senate legislation states that the restrictions apply to oil rather than gas, but the wells for Shah Deniz 2 produce a light form of oil known as condensate along with gas and so could potentially be hit.
The sanctions could also affect Chevron's $37bn expansion of the Tengiz project in Kazakhstan. The oil from Tengiz flows in a pipeline through Russia to the Black Sea, so the Senate bill's bar on US companies supporting or facilitating the "construction, modernisation, or repair of energy pipelines by the Russian Federation" could apply.
"In terms of where new sanctions take us, there is some uncertainty in what is written," said a senior executive at a western oil company with projects in Russia. "If they are to make it through Congress, I would expect the language to be tightened up in some areas to clear it up."
|January, 22, 08:50:00|
|January, 22, 08:45:00|
|January, 22, 08:40:00|
|January, 22, 08:35:00|
|January, 22, 08:30:00|
|January, 22, 08:25:00|
WNA - Apart from adding capacity, utilisation of existing plants has improved markedly since 2000. In the 1990s capacity factors averaged around 60%, but they have steadily improved since and in 2010, 2011 and 2014 were above 81%. Balakovo was the best plant in 2011 with 92.5%, and again in 2014 with 85.1%.
WNA - India has a flourishing and largely indigenous nuclear power programme and expects to have 14.6 GWe nuclear capacity on line by 2024 and 63 GWe by 2032. It aims to supply 25% of electricity from nuclear power by 2050.
WNA - Mainland China has 38 nuclear power reactors in operation, about 20 under construction, and more about to start construction. The reactors under construction include some of the world's most advanced, to give a 70% increase of nuclear capacity to 58 GWe by 2020-21. Plans are for up to 150 GWe by 2030, and much more by 2050.
PLATTS - "The domestic uranium mining industry needs US government assistance to survive the foreign onslaught -- particularly from Russia and Kazakhstan -- that has undermined the US uranium industry while new players -- particularly China -- will soon make the situation worse," Energy Fuels and Ur-Energy said in a petition they jointly filed with the department.