CHINA TO BUILD ISLANDS
Despite all denials coming from the Chinese officials in recent months, China is reportedly planning to build gigantic floating islands in the disputed South China Sea. This unchecked ambition of Chinese leaders will surely tip this already heated-up Asian sub-region into what experts called "land-grabbing tussle", a situation that might be escalated into civil wars among China and countries like the Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Brunei, Cambodia and Indonesia that also lay claim to some parts of these islands.
China's construction plans in the South China Sea
China's acts have seen it construct military installations, port facilities, radar instruments, and airstrips on the contested Spratly Islands. According to a recent report released by Jeffrey Lin and P.W. Singer in Popular Science, China's plans to construct floating islands in the oil-rich South China Sea may seem quite futuristic, but it is practically possible. China hopes to use the yet-to-be-constructed islands as mobile battle stations, which can be utilized for both civilian and military purposes. These battle stations could serve as points for resupplying forces for immediate action in the area and for hosting amphibian vehicles. The largest vessel's model suggested by Tangshan-based Jidang Development Group believed that the vessel's length should be 900 meters, width 120 meters and around 300 meters by 90 meters for small amphibian vessels. The islands will also have a naval base as well as hangar storage and a taking-off and landing area for Chinese Air Forces.
The idea of building of futuristic islands is not a new phenomenon: The British Royal Navy attempted to construct floating islands to host 2-million-ton aircraft carriers during the World War II. The British Navy hoped to sink German U-Boats and other Nazi vessels by mobilizing forces from the floating islands. Similarly, the United States Navy attempted to produce Joint Mobile Offshore Base in 2000, which will be stationed on a 1.5 mile airstrip situated in the sea (a kind of floating island!).
So, China's plan to construct huge floating islands should be seen as avoidable provocation. China is actually flaring up the islands' dispute by militarizing the region. On Thursday, July 30, 2015 Chinese Defense Ministry accused the United States of fomenting trouble in the region by working conscientiously to militarize the South China Sea. China alleged that the US is seemingly taking sides with some other Asian countries like Japan and Philippines with which it has perennial territorial disputes.
Are Chinese allegations against the United States justified? What are the series of events that eventually make the tension in the region near all-time high and becoming uncomfortably dangerous?
U.S. navy surveillance of the South China Sea
On May 21, 2015, the United States Navy caught on camera using its P-8A Poseidon surveillance aircraft some China's dredging vessels around the Fiery Cross Reef, which is part of the disputed Spratly Islands. Malaysia, Vietnam and the Philippines also considered these islands as their own. Recent subtle moves to forcefully retake these islands by China has not only created hot debates and fiery protests from other countries disputing its illegitimate claims but also nudged the region tensely towards a military confrontation. In addition to sending military and civilian personnel to monitor the islands regularly, China has also recently constructed an airfield spanning between 200 and 300 meters for military drills on Spratly Islands.
The United States has always had one clear message for China: stop the militarization around the islands and resolve the disputes amicably by applying international laws. So far, China has not chosen a path of peace and has been wielding or displaying its newly acquired military capabilities, threatening its Asian rivals as far as those contentious islands are concerned. Imagine, China comes second only to the United States in military spending: Despite the extent of poverty that affects most of Chinese populace, Chinese leaders are undeterred to spend a whopping amount of money on purchasing new and modern weaponry. With an annual budget of $131 billion, China can easily maintain its 1.3 million soldiers and add to its fleet of over 1000 fighter jets, 200 attack helicopters, 9150 tanks, 1770 Multiple-Launch Rocket Systems (MLRSs), a combination of dangerous weapons its Asian rivals do not have in their military arsenals.
It is not only China's gigantic army that makes its Asian neighbors to be perpetually under panic attacks, current acts of provocations by Chinese military officials confirm that the Asian Tiger has no immediate plan to resolve the territorial and maritime disputes it has with its counterparts in the region peacefully. Take for instance, in July 2015, China paraded the contested islands with over 100 naval ships and dozens of warplanes that reportedly scattered live ammunition all over the place. Chinese military officials had quickly dispelled this military drill as an act of threat against its rivals but tagged it as a routine military exercise. But how about the scary and unusual military games carried out by Chinese soldiers near the Myanmar border, showing off the power and reach of its ground-to-air rockets and ballistic missiles? Does a peace-loving nation engage in scare tactics that could nervously put its neighbors on the edge of their seats?
China vs US: Militarization of the South China Sea
It is safe to ask this thought-provoking question: who is actually militarizing the region? China or the United States? In due loyalty to its allies in the region, most especially Japan and the Philippines, the United States could not remain inactive in the face of all these forms of aggression displayed by the Chinese military. It is on record that the 1960 Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between Japan and the United States led to the establishment of US bases in Japan. And similar military pact with the Philippines saw the location of 5 US bases in the country, the military outpost where the US Army hopes to launch a defensive mission in case should Chinese soldiers go berserk and begin to attack its Asian rivals.
Some American pundits have always criticized US involvement in the South China Sea territorial problem; some see the US actions as unnecessary and incursionary. Those points of view are not only misguided but also quite unfortunate. This is because the United States stands to lose a lot if it fails to be involved in the impasse. American business and political interests are obviously at stake if China is left to go on rampage unchecked: And there is no better way to make China feel the might and concern of the United States by sending Chinese leaders some strong warnings. Any attempt to let China undermine the security of US chief allies like Japan and the Philippines will send wrong signals across the globe that the US is not capable of fulfilling its statutory promises made by agreeing to security treaties with its allies.
|September, 21, 11:00:00|
|September, 21, 10:55:00|
|September, 21, 10:45:00|
|September, 21, 10:40:00|
|September, 21, 10:35:00|
|September, 21, 10:30:00|
U.S. EIA - Energy companies’ free cash flow—the difference between cash from operations and capital expenditure—was $119 billion for the four quarters ending June 30, 2018, the largest four-quarter sum during 2013–18 Companies reduced debt for seven consecutive quarters, contributing to the lowest long-term debt-to-equity ratio since third-quarter 2014
OPEC - Total oil demand for 2018 is now estimated at 98.82 mb/d. In 2019, world oil demand growth is forecast to rise by 1.41 mb/d. Total world oil demand in 2019 is now projected to surpass 100 mb/d for the first time and reach 100.23 mb/d.
ARAB NEWS - Oil exports from southern Iraq are heading for a record high this month, two industry sources said, adding to signs that OPEC’s second-largest producer is following through on a deal to raise supply and local unrest is not affecting shipments.
PLATTS - The International Energy Agency expects the US to account for 75% of the global growth in natural gas exports over the next five years, a bullish outlook for LNG developers facing challenges at home getting projects off the ground and abroad with tariffs affecting trade flows.